Share/Bookmark

Share/Bookmark

If the earth stood still, the oceans would gradually migrate toward the poles and cause land in the equatorial region to emerge. This would eventually result in a huge equatorial megacontinent and two large polar oceans. The line that delineates the areas that hydrologically contribute to one or the other ocean would follow the equator if the earth was a perfect ellipsoid. However, due to the significant relief of both the continents and the ocean floor, the hypothetical global divide between the areas that hydrologically contribute to one or another ocean deviates from the equator significantly. Analogous to the well-known U.S. Continental Divide, this would be the border separating two giant hemispherical watersheds of the new circumpolar oceans. Interestingly, the highest point on this global divide would not be the highest altitude on the entire globe. The highest elevation of the global divide in the Colombian Andes would be about 12,280 meters, whereas the altitudes of the famous equatorial volcanoes of Chimborazo (Ecuador) and Kilimanjaro (Tanzania) would be 13,615 and 12,786 meters, respectively. Both volcanoes happen not to be located on the global divide line. The lowest point on the new global dividing line, with an elevation of 2,760 meters, would be situated southwest of Kiribati Island in the western Pacific.

(src Witold Fraczek, Esri)

Share/Bookmark

The report also notes that the Google Android platform continues to show rapid growth and over the past six months has edged past the Apple iPhone platform with new subscribers. But even with the latest spike, the iPhone still remains the smartphone that is most coveted by consumers.

(src www.nytimes.com)

Share/Bookmark

Share/Bookmark

Share/Bookmark

Share/Bookmark

Share/Bookmark

Share/Bookmark

With the development of cartography, the history of landscapes has taken more and more importance to delineate the development of social settlements. As cited from [1] the illustration, let us take the famous depiction of Napoleon’s march on Moscow published by Charles Joseph Minard in 1861 ( a detailed description can be found in Tufte ). The author engages the readers in the exploration of the fate of Napoleon’s army in the Russian campaign of 1812-1813. Beginning at the Polish-Russian border, the thick band shows the size of the army at each position. The path of Napoleon’s retreat from Moscow in the cold winter is depicted by the dark lower band, which is tied to temperature and time scales. Tufte identified six separate variables that were shown within Minard’s drawing. First, the line width continuously marked the size of the army. Second and third, the line itself showed the latitude and longitude of the army as it moved. Fourth, the lines themselves showed the direction that the army was travelling, both in advance and retreat. Fifth, the location of the army with respect to certain dates was marked. Finally, the temperature along the path of retreat was displayed. It can also be noted that, despite of the schematic character of the drawing with its rudimentary cartography, Minard depicted some features of the underlying territory (specifically, rivers and towns) he deemed essential for the understanding of the story.

(src Adrienko et al.)

Share/Bookmark