Skip to content
Aug 7 / simonecampora

Smart Pointers

If you know a bit of C++ coding, you are forcely aware of the pitfalls you may encur while using pointers. However such an abstract data type is mostly used via its smart versions. Smart pointers are abstractions that aids the developer to overcome issues of memory allocation, leak and loosen relationship between what the execution program has in memory and what the executed code it is capable of handling. This small post is aimed to list and summarize the different smart pointers that can be used in C++ and give a little of background on how to use them and why. The examples are taken from the web.


Description: it is part of the C++ Standard Library, it stores a pointer to single allocated objects. It means that whenever the pointer is referenced by a second auto_ptr it loses the ownership: sauto_ptr have strict ownership, it means that only the last assigned scoped_ptr really contains the address of the object. Look at the example for clarifications. Strict ownership is useful while you want to ensure to really knows that the pointer you are handling is the only one that can destroy the object and it cannot be done by someone else.

Benefits: This pointer is useful whenever you need to allocate local variables that you never want to have accessible outside of the scope.


#include <iostream>
#include <memory>

int main(int argc, char **argv)
 int *i = new int;
 std::auto_ptr<int> first(i);
 std::auto_ptr<int> second;

 second = first;

 std::cout << first.get() << std::endl;  // NULL
 std::cout << second.get() << std::endl; // Good address

 return 0;


Description: it is part of C++ Library. Peculiariy of scoped_ptr is that it guarantees the object to be deleted. You can delete it either via destructor or by calling reset function. Once the definition of the pointer exits the execution scope, the destructor is automatically called and it deallocate the memory taken by the scoped_ptr.

Benefits: scoped_ptr adds an extra guarantee that all dynamic allocate memory areas will be deallocated when the execution is out of scope, even if the destructor for the given type is never called (or forgotten). Like the auto_ptr it does not have extra attributed definite with it, therefore it has no memory overhead (i.e. no extra storage required compared to a classic pointer).


#include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp>
#include <iostream>

struct Shoe { ~Shoe() { std::cout << "Buckle my shoe\n"; } };

class MyClass {
 boost::scoped_ptr<int> ptr;
 MyClass() : ptr(new int) { *ptr = 0; }
 int add_one() { return ++*ptr; }

int main()
 boost::scoped_ptr<Shoe> x(new Shoe);
 MyClass my_instance;
 std::cout << my_instance.add_one() << '\n';
 std::cout << my_instance.add_one() << '\n';


Description: The shared_ptr is an enhanced version of scoped_ptr. It guarantees that the memory allocated will be finally deleted after the last instance of shared_ptr to that memory index is reset or destroyed. It is part of the C++ Library and it is using reference counting to detect when the destructor needs to be called (also called shared ownership principle).

Benefits: It takes care of deallocating the memory when the very last reference to that pointer is used. It could be very helpful in distributed environments since it can be used to reference the same object concurrently by different Thread “safely”.


shared_ptr<A> a(new A);
shared_ptr<A> b(a);

// Thread 1     // Thread 2
 a.reset();      b.reset();


Description: It is a smart pointer that holds a non-owning reference to an object that is already maanged by a shared_ptr. Since its relationship is “weak”, it does not increase the reference counter of shared_ptr. It is again part of the C++ Library.

Benefits: It is useful whenever you do not need to add a new reference that change the last ownership of the pointer. It can also be used to solve tricky issues with cyclic references.


std::shared_ptr<int> p1(new int(5));
std::weak_ptr<int> wp1 = p1; //p1 owns the memory.


Description: it is a smart pointer that enables embedded reference count. It means you can redefine functions that are adding references and releasing them. They have really specific uses, therefore it is generally adsivsable to use shared_ptr pointers.

Benefits: Gives you more control on the refering system of smart pointer whereas in the meanwhile does not had any overhead in memory to the pointer itself.


#include <boost/intrusive_ptr.hpp>
#include <boost/atomic.hpp>

class X {
 typedef boost::intrusive_ptr<X> pointer;
 X() : refcount_(0) {}

 mutable boost::atomic<int> refcount_;
 friend void intrusive_ptr_add_ref(const X * x)
 x->refcount_.fetch_add(1, boost::memory_order_relaxed);
 friend void intrusive_ptr_release(const X * x)
 if (x->refcount_.fetch_sub(1, boost::memory_order_release) == 1) {
 delete x;


Description: This last smart pointer is the most restrictive smart pointer: not only it handles the ownership of the allocated memory but it does not allow any other smart pointer to reference to the same address. as scoped_ptr it destroys the object when out of scope. It replaces the old auto_ptr in std library.

Benefits: it avoids uncertain ownership among scoped_ptr pointers.


void foo()
 std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int);
 //do some stuff that might throw
May 20 / simonecampora

ST-Toolkit presentation for AGILE 2011 Conference

here it is the published presentation of ST-Toolkit proof of concept library for Spatio Temporal data warehousing:

Aug 6 / simonecampora

The Distress call “Mayday” com…

The Distress call “Mayday” comes from the French m’aider. “Venez m’aider” means “come help me”.

Aug 5 / simonecampora

What would happen if the earth stopped spinning?

The resulting world

If the earth stood still, the oceans would gradually migrate toward the poles and cause land in the equatorial region to emerge. This would eventually result in a huge equatorial megacontinent and two large polar oceans. The line that delineates the areas that hydrologically contribute to one or the other ocean would follow the equator if the earth was a perfect ellipsoid. However, due to the significant relief of both the continents and the ocean floor, the hypothetical global divide between the areas that hydrologically contribute to one or another ocean deviates from the equator significantly. Analogous to the well-known U.S. Continental Divide, this would be the border separating two giant hemispherical watersheds of the new circumpolar oceans. Interestingly, the highest point on this global divide would not be the highest altitude on the entire globe. The highest elevation of the global divide in the Colombian Andes would be about 12,280 meters, whereas the altitudes of the famous equatorial volcanoes of Chimborazo (Ecuador) and Kilimanjaro (Tanzania) would be 13,615 and 12,786 meters, respectively. Both volcanoes happen not to be located on the global divide line. The lowest point on the new global dividing line, with an elevation of 2,760 meters, would be situated southwest of Kiribati Island in the western Pacific.

(src Witold Fraczek, Esri)

Aug 4 / simonecampora

Android Beats iPhone in 2010 Q2 !

The Nielsen Company smartphone graphics

The Nielsen Company smartphone graphics
The Nielsen Company Graphics from the Nielsen report show the market share of smartphone operating systems. By the end of 2011, there could be more smartphones in the United States than the less advanced feature phones, according to a report released Monday by the Nielsen Company, a market trends monitor.

The report also notes that the Google Android platform continues to show rapid growth and over the past six months has edged past the Apple iPhone platform with new subscribers. But even with the latest spike, the iPhone still remains the smartphone that is most coveted by consumers.


Switch to our mobile site